Solvent vs Catalytic Dewaxing

Another separation process in petroleum refining is, the process of dewaxing. What dewaxing is, is exactly what one might guess, and that is the removal of wax from a feedstock in an oil refinery. That feedstock can either be, deasphalted oil from deasphalting or heavy vacuum gas oil from vacuum distillation. The wax that is removed from the feedstock is long chain paraffin moleculues that solidify readily within the feedstock and once removed can be sold as a marketable by-product. Once a feedstock has undergone dewaxing, it can be used as the basis for lubricating oils, this is the most desired product of dewaxing.

Dewaxing however, can be accomplished using one of two different methods. Those methods are known as solvent dewaxing, and catalytic dewaxing. These two types of dewaxing have their obvious differences.

The first type, solvent dewaxing, is a physical process that includes the refridgeration of a feedstock after it has be mixed with a solvent. What happens is, once the feedstock is refrigerated, the wax within it solidifies and forms crystals. These crystals are then carried to a large rotating drum covered by a filter cloth. It is on the cloth that the wax will accumulate, thus removing it from the feedstock until it is removed from the surface of the drum using a large blade. This product is called slack wax and it then further undergoes steam stripping to recycle and remove the solvent. This wax product can then be used for things like candle wax and petroleum jelly.

Catalytic dewaxing is the second technique used and this is a chemical process. Catalytic dewaxing is the selective cracking of the long chain paraffins or wax into smaller chain alkanes. This is done by way of using a sieve catalyst to filter out the i-paraffins and filter the n-paraffins into cracking reactions. This is accomplished by way of using catalysts with very small pores, as small as 0.6 nm, that only allow n-paraffin’s long chain structure to pass through while blocking the bulky i-paraffins. Catalytic dewaxing is the cheaper of the two processes, as well as it is more flexible because it can be used to produce either lube oil base stock or light distillates.

Solvent Fractionation and Non-Polar Solvent Power

Solvent fractionation is a further form of distillation that takes place in the Light Ends Unit (LEU). The feedstock for solvent fractionation is the residue that is left over from previous Vacuum Distillation, aptly called, vacuum distillation residue (VDR). VDR is a very heavy viscous compound that is solid at ambient temperatures. The reason vacuum distillation residue is so dense, is because of its high aromaticity along with its high asphaltene concentration. Asphaltenes are the highest molecular weight compounds contained in VDR, and appear in solution. What solvent separation is, is when the asphaltenes within VDR are precipitated from the solution using a light paraffinic solvent. The portion of the VDR that is soluble in the paraffin is called maltenes. The first paraffin used is typically n-heptane. The n-heptane soluables can further be separated using n-pentane, which is a lighter an weaker solvent. The result of this step is an insoluable compound called hard resin and n-pentane soluables. Finally, the lightest of the solvents, propane, is used. This final stage yields soft resin and oil products. In refining, this is done by skipping to the final step and only using propane, which yields asphalt and deasphalted oil.

The solubility of compounds in different solvents can be measured. For non-polar solvents, solvents are measured using Hildebrand Solubility Parameters (HSP). What the Hildebrand Solubility Parameters are, are two parameters used to accurately determine the solubility power for non-polar solvents. The first of the two parameters pertains to the surface tension and the molar volume of the solvent, while the second pertains to the energy of vaporization and the molar volume of the solvent. In general, the solubility parameter increases with increasing density of the solvent, as well as increasing surface tension or energy of vaporization of the solvent. With this knowledge we are able to understand why using too large of a volume of a solvent will interfere with the solubility of asphaltenes.

Dewaxing Processes

Dewaxing is a separation process that takes advantage of deasphalted oil (DAO) and heavy vacuum gas oil (HVGO) from the vacuum distillation tower as feedstocks in producing lubricating oil base stock and, to some extent, distillate fuels such as gasoline. The goal of dewaxing is to remove hydrocarbons that would potentially increase the pour point of the lube oil base stock to a desirable range of -9o – 14o F. There is two different processes that result in this marketable lube oil: solvent dewaxing and catalytic dewaxing.

Solvent dewaxing is a physical process that uses refrigeration, scraping techniques, and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) and propane solvents to separate the feedstocks and produce a valuable product. The MEK solvent and the deasphalted oil combine in the first phase and go through a series of refrigeration processes at different temperatures to form wax crystals, which are then transported to a rotary filter where a filter cloth separates the wax from the oil + solvent. The wax goes on to produce candle wax and petroleum jelly while the dewaxed oil purifies into the desirable lube oil base stock. Issues that arise from this process come from choosing which type of solvents to use. Most refineries use MEK even though propane can be used from multiple aspects of the process, save money, increase filtration rates.

Catalytic dewaxing is a chemical process that, by nature, is actually a conversion process. It uses catalytic cracking of n-paraffins, but since the purpose is to remove wax, it is classified as a separation process. There is not much detail to this process although it does use hydrogen addition to prevent coking. It is obviously the best way to dewax the feedstocks because it results in a product with lower pour points, high yield, and high stability. Catalytic dewaxing also allows for the production of light distillates such as gasoline since the n-paraffins are cracking.

 

Solvent Fractionation & Non-Polar Solvent Power

In reality, distillation can never achieve absolute separation of the different hydrocarbons liquids that enter the Light Ends Unit (LEU) as feedstock. Theoretically, there is a way to achieve a degree of separation that proves suitable for the refinery’s needs by distilling small fractions of the liquid using a number of ‘theoretical plates’. The feedstock that enters the LEU has components of low molecular weight and high volatility. These characteristics allow refineries to analyze the feedstock on a molecular level and define the degree of separation in terms of specific hydrocarbon concentrations. Once a stage of distillation is complete, the new condensate, enriched in the more volatile component, is taken past the next plate and redistilled in a different section. This process proceeds for however many theoretical plates are calculated until almost-pure components are left. For the Light Ends Unit, the feed is separated into two fractions, the distillate and the bottoms.

 

Solvent extraction out of the vacuum distilled residue pulls the asphaltenes out of the one-phase material. The strength of a specific compound, determined by the two Hildebrande Parameters, indicates the solubility of said compound in a solvent. The first parameter depends upon the surface tension and molar volume of the non-polar solvent while the second parameter uses the solvent’s energy of vaporization and molar volume. With these different characteristics in mind, it is easy to see how each component of the vacuum distilled residue has their own solubility properties. Aromatic hyrdocarbons have higher density than aliphatic hyrdrocarbons, which means that they also have a lower molar volume. This results in the increase of the second Hildebrande Paramenter (and consequently the increase of compound strength) since molar volume is the denominator in the equation. On the same line, higher carbon number paraffins have a larger molar volume, resulting in a lower strength value. Using this information, refineries add a large amount of low strength paraffin solvent to the vacuum dissolved residue to basically ‘cancel out’ the asphaltene’s solubility and yield solid particles that can be filtered out.

The removal of wax from feed stocks using solvents and catalytic dewaxing processing

After my one Penn State laboratory class where we chilled different hydrocarbons to measure the cloud point (temperature at initial wax formation) and pour point (temperature at which hydrocarbon became practically solidified) it was determined that the cold resistance of fuel from forming wax was an important property of a hydrocarbon. In a real life application hydrocarbons are enhanced by additives to resist the wax (long-chain paraffin) formation. Before any additives are blended into fuels they undergo a solvent or catalytic dewaxing processes.

The first method for dewaxing is by using the physical process of solvent dewaxing. The two main solvents that are used in the solvent dewaxing process are propane and ketones (either methyl ketone with methyl isobutyl ketone or methyl ketone with toluene.) The object of solvent dewaxing to mix the solvents with the deasphaling oil, which will dilute the feedstock reducing viscosity, and then the mixture is cooled down until wax is formed. [1] Once the wax was formed it is sent into a rotating drum that forces the wax crystals to the outside where I can be extracted. The most economical way to perform this process is by using Dilchill dewaxing. Dilchill dewaxing is a process that injects cold solvent into DAO stream where it is highly agitated forcing the formation of larger wax crystals.[1]

Another way to extract wax from DAO is by Catalytic Dewaxing. Catalytic dewaxing is the chemical process that uses hydrocracking, performed by zeolite catalysts, to break apart the long chained n-paraffins to form branched i-paraffins. As mentioned before, this will cause the cloud point and pour point to be reduced. Going one step further, catalytic cracking can use two enzymes for the reduction of pour point and to also improve on the oxygen stability of the DAO. [1] Catalytic dewaxing the the preferred process compared to solvent dewaxing because it has a better yield and is a cheaper overall process.

Sources:
1. Gary, J. H., & Handwerk, G. E. (2007). Petroleum refining: technology and economics. New York: M. Dekker.

Product removal from applying solvents and non-polar solvents to a feedstock

Solvent fractionation is the process in which solvents, such as n-heptane, n-pentane, and propane, are used to further separate the feedstock that comes from the initial distillation process. The most common application for solvent fractionation is performed on the vacuum distillation residue. The reason that this feedstock is distilled further is because it can create different marketable products such as asphalt (from asphaltene), resins, and oil (used for lubrication and other products). The way that these distillates are separated, from the aromatic solvents of benzene and toluene, occurs in three stages which blend the feedstock with increasingly lighter paraffinic solvents. The first stage is using n-heptane to separate the solid asphaltene product from the VDR feedstock. The portions, such as n-heptane maltenes, which are soluble in the heptane solvent, are introduced to n-pentane. N-pentane allows for hard resin to be separated from the feedstock, and allows for further separation of the soluble products to finally be treated with propane to separate the feedstock into soft resin and oil.
In order to further understand how asphaltenes are extracted from the feedstock, with the use of n-heptane, n-pentane, and propane, one would need to use the Hildebrand Solubility Parameters. These parameters are used to determine the solvent power of these non-polar solvents and how the different carbon numbers define the power of the solvent. The Hildebrand Solubility Parameters use the characteristics of surface tension, molar volume, and energy of vaporization to be able to decide which solvent is best for asphaltene and resid extraction. Ultimately, the goal for this process is to obtain the highly usable deasphalted oils so that they can be further processed to make lube oil base stock and distillate fuels. Most of the deasphalting process is conducted by propane and then is further processed by furfural, phenol, and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone solvents to separate the high carbon aromatics from the naphthenic and paraffinic ones. [1]
Sources:
1. Gary, J. H., & Handwerk, G. E. (2007). Petroleum refining: technology and economics. New York: M. Dekker.

Dewaxing: Chemical and Physical

Desirable by-products are ones that come from lube oil base stocks such as waxes that consist of long chain paraffins. There are two ways of “dewaxing” which removes wax from the feedstocks. These methods are solvent dewaxing and catalytic dewaxing.  They are physical and chemical methods respectively. Solvent dewaxing separates waxes using freezing points. Freezing is done in stages after being mixed with the solvent.  This process then forms wax crystals which is then further modified to produce slack wax. Slack wax is found in many everyday common objects such as candles. This method is done in a deasphalting process separates vacuum distillation residue. After placing the residue into an aromatic solvent, an alkane solvent is added which has the effect of some of the compounds to become insoluble. When this happens they precipitate out.

Catalytic dewaxing ultimately increases the ratio of i-paraffins to n-praffins. It does this through the chemical reactions of long chain n-alkanes which will lower the pour point of the wax. When comparing catalytic dewaxing to solvent dewaxing, catalytic waxing is the better method. It gets more lube oil stock because of the variance in pour point as well as its ability to produce both lube oil base stock and light distillates.

Two methods of dewaxing and comparison of them

Dewaxing is a separation process that removes wax from feedstock such as DAO from deasphalting and HVGO from vacuum distillation in refining process. Wax is a desirable by-product which is necessary to remove for producing lubricating oil base stock with low pour points. Solvent dewaxing and catalytic dewaxing are the two commercial methods of dewaxing that generally used in refining process. Solvent dewaxing is a physical process which involves freezing and solvent transport. Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) and propane are the two main solvents used in this process. In US, MEK is the most common solvent used in process because it has advantages such as lower capital investment, energy saving and higher filtration rates. The process need to freeze the feedstock in a several stage. Wax crystals will be formed by solidifying wax compounds thought the refrigeration. In a rotary filter, crystals will be dissolved in solvent and separated. Eventually, the layer of wax will go through the steam stripping unit to separate solvent from the product. Unlike solvent dewaxing, catalytic dewaxing is a chemical process which involves reactions of long-chain n-alkenes. A selective catalytic cracking of n-paraffins take place in this process. In the pores of molecular sieve catalysts (zeolites), the pores only open 0.6 nm to filter i-paraffin out. Through this process, the ratio of i-paraffins and n-paraffins will increase to lower the pour point. In order to prevent coking on the surface, hydrogen is used alone the process. This cracking process produces some by-products such as gasoline. Overall, two dewaxing achieve the goal to lower the pour points and separate wax. However, catalytic dewaxing produce lube base stock with even lower pour point and in higher yield. Solvent dewaxing produce lube base stock in a lower yield because to separate the wax from oil in this process is hard.

 

 

solvent fractionation and Hildebrand Solubility Parameters (HSP)

In lesson 4, we learned that distillation is a separation process which depends on the boiling point of compounds. Compare to distillation, solvent fractionation fractionate the feedstock or vacuum distillation residue (VDR) depend on the solubility of the compound in the given solution. Use graph from lesson 5 on class website as an example, it showed us a simple flow of the process. Asphaltenes, which are compounds that have highest molecular weight of VDR, is soluble in aromatic solution such as benzene and toluene. They can be separated by using precipitation under the condition that paraffin solvent was mixed in. Maltenes is the part of VDR which is soluble in paraffin solvent and also known as a solvent in the separation process. For further separation of n-heptane soluble, a lighter and weaker solvent n-pentane is used. That gives us an insoluble fraction (hard resin) and soluble fraction (n-pentane). Even lighter solvent propane is used to separate soluble fraction (n-pentane) to soft resin and oil products.

Since there is a large difference in structure of asphaltenes and oil fractions in VDR, it is normal for us to see a suspension of discrete asphaltene particles rather than a solution in VDR. However, VDR normally appear as a solution (one-phase material). The gradient solubility model is a general acceptable hypothesis that explains what we observed. In this model, the strength of solvent influences the solubility of a compound in given solvent. Hildebrand Solubility Parameters (HSP) measures the strength of solvent in this model. There two types of parameters used in the measurement and they correlate well to each other. 1st Hildebrand Parameter depends on surface tension and molar volume of the given solvent. 2nd Hildebrand Parameter depends on energy of evaporation and molar volume of given solvent. From the equations of two parameters, we can see that solubility increase with increasing surface tension, increasing energy evaporation and decreasing molar volume. As we know, aromatic solvent are stronger solvent than aliphatic hydrocarbon and it is explained by two types of Hildebrand parameters. That also explains why increasing carbon number make the solvent power of paraffin solvent increase.

The Comparison of Solvent and Catalytic Dewaxing

Dewaxing is process carried out in oil refineries that takes in deasphalted oil as well as heavy gas oil and attempts to produce a lubricating oil base stock. Lubricating oil is desired to have low pour points, low volatility, moderate viscosity, a high viscosity index, and a high thermal stability however to produce such a substance oils must have long chain paraffinic compounds removed through one of two processes: solvent dewaxing or catalytic dewaxing.

Solvent dewaxing is a physical process where solvents such as methyl ethyl ketone or propane are added to the oil mixture and then the oil mixture is cooled in a refrigeration unit. The temperature of this refrigeration unit will be based on the amount of waxes that need to be removed to reach the desired qualities of the lubricating oil. Once the solvent is mixed in and the solution is cooled, the wax will begin to form crystals and solidify. The solid wax will build up on a cloth within the separation unit then cut off and removed via a solvent stream. As a last step this wax is run through a steam stripper where the solvent can be taken back out and recycled. The lubricating oil is run through a steam stripper to remove and recycle the solvent as well.

Catalytic dewaxing is a chemical process where the long chain paraffins are cracked through the use of a selective catalyst. This catalyst is a molecular sieve with small specifically sized pore openings which allow n-paraffins to enter and be cracked while keeping i-paraffins out of the cracking process. By having a catalyst of this nature it allows the number of n-paraffins to increase while keeping the number of i-paraffins close to the same which increases the n-paraffin to i-paraffin ratio. This is beneficial to the desired lubricating oil product because as the ratio increases the pour point decreases and thus creates a better oil. Due to the selectivity of the catalyst, catalytic dewaxing has a higher yield of more consistent products when compared to solvent dewaxing. Catalytic dewaxing often costs less to install in a refinery system than solvent dewaxing.