Solvent Fractionation and Non-polar Solvents Power

Blog 4

Write a post explaining how solvent fractionation works and review the parameters to describe the solvent power for non-polar solvents.


 

Through the process of deasphalting, a solvent is used to fractionate various feedstocks. Deasphalting performs its fractionations based upon the components of solubility and insolubility of feedstocks where distillation uses the boiling point temperatures to make fractionations. Vacuum distillation residue, known as VDR, is completely dissolved in aromatic solvents such as toluene and benzene.  VDR is typically in the form of a solid at room temperature so then the aromatic solvents are used to create a liquid mixture where a light paraffin solvent is mixed with the feedstock mixture to precipitate the VDR asphaltene. Depending upon solubility the asphaltene is then separated from the mixture.The VDR component that is soluble in this light paraffin is referred to as a maltene and is considered a one phase material solution. Through the gradient solubility model it is explained that asphaltene molecules can dissolve and give a single phase solution. Through solvent extraction and VDR the asphaltene can be removed from the solution.

The VDR compounds solubility, which effects the extraction, depends on the strength of the solvent which is measured for non-polar solvents by the Hildebrand Solubility Parameters, also known as HSP. There are two different Hildebrand solubility parameters that affect this solubility. The first parameter measures the relationship between surface tension and the cube root of molar volume. These happen to have an inverse relationship where surface tension increases with decreasing molar volume. Solubility also increases with surface tension. The second parameter measures solubility based upon the relationship between the heat energy required for vaporization and the molar volume. This is typically calculated under constant volume. Solubility increases in this case with an increase in the amount of energy for vaporization.

The Two Dewaxing Processes

Blog 5

Write a post comparing the solvent dewaxing and catalytic dewaxing processes.


 

Dewaxing is a process used to remove waxes from oil refinery feed stocks. Once the wax is removed it can be sold as a bi-product for things such as candles and other forms of waxes. The feedstock after being dewaxed can be used as various lubricating oils and other distillate fuels such as gasoline. Dewaxing is performed on a feedstock through two different processes. One is a physical process that uses a solvent and is known as solvent dewaxing. The other is a chemical process and uses catalytic cracking and is known as catalytic dewaxing.

In solvent dewaxing a solvent is added to the feedstock and the mixture is then chilled to a desirable temperature and then proceeds through a rotary filter which separates the solid wax from the feedstock. This is because of the components varying freezing temperatures which allows for seperation to occur. Solvent dewaxing primarily uses two types of solvents being propane and methyl ethyl ketone, also known as MEK. MEK is more commonly used as a solvent due to its minor variance in filtration and pour point temperatures along with its chilling rate characteristics.

Catalytic dewaxing involves the breaking and creation of bonds. It is known as a conversion process of n-paraffins.  This form of dewaxing is able to break apart and actually remove long chain n-paraffins. Catalytic dewaxing uses sieve catalysts to filter with a pore opening size very small so that i-paraffins can be captured and filtered out and only n-paraffins shall be able to pass through. This can also help to lower the feedstock’s pour point value.  Catalytic dewaxing will produce a lube base stock with a lower pour point and a higher yield than that of a feedstock that underwent solvent dewaxing. Catalytic dewaxing is a less expensive form of dewaxing, but both processes have their pros and cons.

Two methods of dewaxing and comparison of them

Dewaxing is a separation process that removes wax from feedstock such as DAO from deasphalting and HVGO from vacuum distillation in refining process. Wax is a desirable by-product which is necessary to remove for producing lubricating oil base stock with low pour points. Solvent dewaxing and catalytic dewaxing are the two commercial methods of dewaxing that generally used in refining process. Solvent dewaxing is a physical process which involves freezing and solvent transport. Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) and propane are the two main solvents used in this process. In US, MEK is the most common solvent used in process because it has advantages such as lower capital investment, energy saving and higher filtration rates. The process need to freeze the feedstock in a several stage. Wax crystals will be formed by solidifying wax compounds thought the refrigeration. In a rotary filter, crystals will be dissolved in solvent and separated. Eventually, the layer of wax will go through the steam stripping unit to separate solvent from the product. Unlike solvent dewaxing, catalytic dewaxing is a chemical process which involves reactions of long-chain n-alkenes. A selective catalytic cracking of n-paraffins take place in this process. In the pores of molecular sieve catalysts (zeolites), the pores only open 0.6 nm to filter i-paraffin out. Through this process, the ratio of i-paraffins and n-paraffins will increase to lower the pour point. In order to prevent coking on the surface, hydrogen is used alone the process. This cracking process produces some by-products such as gasoline. Overall, two dewaxing achieve the goal to lower the pour points and separate wax. However, catalytic dewaxing produce lube base stock with even lower pour point and in higher yield. Solvent dewaxing produce lube base stock in a lower yield because to separate the wax from oil in this process is hard.

 

 

solvent fractionation and Hildebrand Solubility Parameters (HSP)

In lesson 4, we learned that distillation is a separation process which depends on the boiling point of compounds. Compare to distillation, solvent fractionation fractionate the feedstock or vacuum distillation residue (VDR) depend on the solubility of the compound in the given solution. Use graph from lesson 5 on class website as an example, it showed us a simple flow of the process. Asphaltenes, which are compounds that have highest molecular weight of VDR, is soluble in aromatic solution such as benzene and toluene. They can be separated by using precipitation under the condition that paraffin solvent was mixed in. Maltenes is the part of VDR which is soluble in paraffin solvent and also known as a solvent in the separation process. For further separation of n-heptane soluble, a lighter and weaker solvent n-pentane is used. That gives us an insoluble fraction (hard resin) and soluble fraction (n-pentane). Even lighter solvent propane is used to separate soluble fraction (n-pentane) to soft resin and oil products.

Since there is a large difference in structure of asphaltenes and oil fractions in VDR, it is normal for us to see a suspension of discrete asphaltene particles rather than a solution in VDR. However, VDR normally appear as a solution (one-phase material). The gradient solubility model is a general acceptable hypothesis that explains what we observed. In this model, the strength of solvent influences the solubility of a compound in given solvent. Hildebrand Solubility Parameters (HSP) measures the strength of solvent in this model. There two types of parameters used in the measurement and they correlate well to each other. 1st Hildebrand Parameter depends on surface tension and molar volume of the given solvent. 2nd Hildebrand Parameter depends on energy of evaporation and molar volume of given solvent. From the equations of two parameters, we can see that solubility increase with increasing surface tension, increasing energy evaporation and decreasing molar volume. As we know, aromatic solvent are stronger solvent than aliphatic hydrocarbon and it is explained by two types of Hildebrand parameters. That also explains why increasing carbon number make the solvent power of paraffin solvent increase.

Solvent Dewaxing VS Catalytic Dewaxing

Write a post comparing the solvent dewaxing and catalytic dewaxing processes.


Wax is made up of long-chain paraffins and it is a desirable by-product, particularly lube oil base stock. Dewaxing is the process of removing wax from feedstocks that would otherwise readily solidify, such as DAO from deasphalting and HVGO from vacuum distillation. There are two commercial methods of dewaxing. On utilizes a physical process known as solvent dewaxing, while the other method of catalytic dewaxing involves a chemical process.

Solvent dewaxing is a physical process which separates the wax with respect to freezing and solvent transport. This method uses stage-wise refrigeration of the feedstock after being mixed with the solvent. Wax crystals are then carried to a rotary filter via the solvent to be separated on a filter cloth. This layer of wax is collected and taken to a steam-stripping unit to recycle the solvent separated from the wax product, known as slack wax. This product has several marketable uses, such as paraffin wax for candles, microwax for cosmetics, and for petroleum jelly. The refrigerator’s temperature can be manipulated to control the desired pour point of the resulting lube oil base stock product.

Catalytic dewaxing is a chemical process, which removes the wax by means of selective reactions of long chain n-alkanes. This method is technically a low-severity conversion process, which involves a selective catalytic cracking of n-paraffins. Molecular sieve catalysts, known as zeolites, host selective cracking of n-alkanes while simultaneously keeping out bulky i-paraffins. Therefore, this process increases the ratio of i-paraffins to n-paraffins in the product, in turn lowering its pour point.

In comparison, catalytic dewaxing has an advantage over solvent dewaxing in the fact that it yields a lube oil base stock with a lower pour point as well as a higher yield of this product. Catalytic dewaxing also poses the flexibility to produce both lube oil base stock along with light distillates such as gasoline.

Solvent Fractionation and Solvent Power Determination

Post a blog to comment on how solvent fractionation works and review the parameters to describe the solvent power for non-polar solvents.


Solvent extraction is a process in which compounds may be separated based on their relative solubilities. It is basically the extraction of a substance from one liquid into another liquid phase. As opposed to distillation which exploits the different boiling points of the feedstock to achieve fractionation, deasphalting utilizes a solvent extraction process that factors in solubility or insolubility of compounds in a certain solvent. Vacuum distillation residue (VDR) is completely dissolved in aromatic solvents, like benzene and toluene. A paraffin solvent (n-heptane) is mixed with VDR in toluene, and the soluble portion of VDR in the n-heptane is called maltenes. The n-heptane solubles can then be further separated using a lighter and weaker solvent, such as n-pentane. These solubles can be separated even further utilizing a lighter solvent like propane. Figure 5 of Lesson 5 shows the overall process of solvent fractionation of VDR.

Rather than being considered a suspension of discrete asphaltene particles in VDR, this residue is actually considered a solution (one-phase material). The gradient solubility model is a widely acknowledged hypothesis which explains this observation. This model declares that asphaltene molecules can dissolve in resins which can then be dissolved in oil, ultimately yielding a single phase solution. The asphaltene is able to be forced out of solution in VDR by solvent extraction. The degree of solubility of a compound in a solvent is dependent upon the dissolving power of the solvent which is measured for non-polar solvents by Hildebrand Solubility Parameters (HSP).

There are two different Hildebrand Solubility Parameters. The first relates solubility to the ratio of surface tension to the cubic root of molar volume, in which solubility increases as surface tension increases and as molar volume decreases. The second parameter equates solubility to the square root of the ratio of latent heat of vaporization to molar volume, where solubility increases with an increasing heat of vaporization. It is clear why aromatic solvents are stronger solvents than aliphatic hydrocarbons.

 

Solvent Extraction: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid%E2%80%93liquid_extraction