Hydrocracking vs Catalytic Cracking

Hydrocracking is essentially the combination of two processes: hydrogenation and cracking. Therefore, hydrocracking utilizes a bifunctional catalyst. The catalysts (highly active noble metals used for hydrogenation e.g. Pt and Pd) used in hydrocracking are very susceptible to poisoning and great care must be taken to remove sulfur from the feedstock. The process is typically accompanied by hydrotreating in order to remove heteroatom species (e.g. S, N and O). Additionally, while catalytic cracking is a carbon rejection process, hydrocracking is in a hydrogen addition process. Therefore, some complications from coking are avoided during the hydrocracking process. Several factors distinguish these two cracking processes; however, typically both processes are used in order to provide the most optimal yield of products in an economically efficient manner. The advantages of hydrocracking include its ability to handle a wide range of feedstock, as well as the selectivity of its distillates.

The primary objective of both cracking processes is to produce lighter saturated hydrocarbons with reduced molecular weights and boiling points from heavy oils. But due to the fact that aromatic rings cannot be cracked until they are fully saturated with hydrogen, the hydrocracking process allows for the processing of more aromatic feedstock, including the byproducts of catalytic cracking (e.g. light cycle oil). Furthermore, by modifying reactor configurations (e.g. fixed bed, ebullated bed, or expanded bed), catalysts, and hydrogen/carbon ratios, hydrocracking can be highly flexible, with the ability to process both relatively light feedstock as well as heavy vacuum residue into light and middle distillates.

Another difference between hydrocracking and catalytic cracking includes the change in enthalpy; while catalytic cracking is an endothermic process, hydrocracking is an exothermic process. The heat for catalytic cracking is supplied by the regeneration of catalysts. The evolution of the catalytic cracking (from Houdry to Thermafor to the modern fluid catalytic cracking) has continuously improved upon the thermal efficiencies of the process.

Although the hydrocracking process has several advantages over fluid catalytic cracking, hydrocracking is, in comparison, a more costly process. Therefore, it is not exclusively used, and refineries typically operate with both processes in order to produce the most desirable yield of products.

Comparing the feedstocks, objectives and products of Catalytic Cracking and Catalytic Hydrocracking

Following the development of a fixed- bed (Houdry process, 1936) and a moving-bed (Thermafor Catalytic Cracking, 1941) catalytic cracking process, fluid-bed catalytic cracking (FCC, 1942) became the most widely used process worldwide because of the improved thermal efficiency of the process and the high product selectivity achieved, particularly after the introduction of crystalline zeolites as catalysts in the 1960s.

 

Catalytic Cracking processes were developed during the Second World War and became widely used ever since because of their improved thermal efficiency and the high product selectivity to produce gasoline with a higher octane number. Also, catalysts and additives are very significant for the selectivity and flexibility of catalytic cracking; the introduction of zeolite catalysts in 1965 has had a huge impact on the industry processes.

 

In 1936, the first full scale industrial catalytic process was developed. It was known as the Houdry Catalytic cracking process, which used much less expensive catalysts, such as clay, natural alumina and silica particles. For this process, the gas oil feed stock must be heated to high temperatures and is fed to a fixed-bed reactor containing the catalyst particles. The product stream is sent to the separator to produce gas, gasoline, light cycle oil (LCO), and heavy cycle (HCO) products. A problem that faced this process was the deactivation of the catalyst bed because of coking. Thus, the process included swing reactors to switch between periodically to overcome this issue. After switching, the reactor is stripped with stream to remove the liquid products from the catalyst bed. The coke is then burnt off to reactivate the catalyst bed. A small percentage of the heat generated by burning off the coke could be used to supply heat for catalytic cracking, however the thermal efficiency of this reaction is considered low.

However, more efficient catalytic cracking processes have been developed. Such process include thermafor catalytic cracking and fluid catalytic cracking. Thermofor cracking utilizes a moving catalyst bed. In addition, catalyst particles used in this process are synthetic and thus have consistent and homogenous properties. This process is a slightly more thermal efficient process than the Houdry process. In comparison, the fluid catalytic cracking utilizes a fluidized catalyst bed. This catalytic cracking process is considered the most thermal efficient process. Also, this process enables the production of large quantities of light distillates known as crackate without the addition of hydrogen by burning off the coke.

 

Catalytic hydrocracking is relatively a recent addition to the petroleum industry. The main reasons for its development are the increasing demand for light and middle distillates, the large quantities of hydrogen as a by-product from catalytic reforming, and the limits imposed on sulfur and aromatics content in motor fuel. Hydrocracking is able to process a wide range of feedstocks. Its main process objective is to decrease the molecular weight and boiling point of the heavy oils from a mostly aromatic feedstock. Through the hydrocracking process, it is possible to convert an aromatic compound to a paraffin compound with out rejecting any carbon. The catalysts used for such reactions include platinum and palladium metals, however, care must be taken as they can be easily poisoned by sulfur.

Source:

Course Website

Wikipedia

 

 

 

Comparison of catalytic Cracking and Hydrocracking process in their feedstock, objectives and products

In order to produce larger amount and high octane contain gasoline, catalytic cracking was developed during World War II. As moving alone with the time, the improvements of this process increase the thermal efficiency of the process. Fluid Catalytic Process (FCC) which was introduced in 1942 has the highest thermal efficiency among the catalytic cracking processes. Catalytic hydrocracking has shorter history than catalytic cracking and it was started in 1958. It is also known as a hydrogen addition process, but Fluid Catalytic Process is known as carbon rejection process. These two processes also have differences in feedstock, process objectives and their products.

For catalytic cracking, it used acid catalytic. Straight run atmospheric gas oil (AGO) and light vacuum gas oil (LVGO) are the typical feedstock for catalytic cracking. Compare to catalytic cracking, hydrocracking use metal catalytic on acid support and has a wider range of feedstock. It can process more aromatic feedstock which resists cracking such as light cycle oil (LCO). It can also process heavy vacuum residue under the extreme condition such as high hydrogen pressures. Those extreme conditions prevent the process from shut down which due to extensive coking on catalyst.

As we learned from lesson 7, the process objectives of two processes are also different. For hydrocracking, its main objective is to decrease both molecular weight and boiling point of heavy oils and produces saturated hydrocarbon from highly aromatic feedstock such as light cycle oil. Since the product of hydrocracking has low sulfur and nitrogen content, it also contributes to limit the sulfur emission and aromatic hydrocarbon in motor fuels. The main objectives of catalytic cracking are to increase the yield of gasoline and number of octane in the gasoline. At the same time, it also lower the yield of coke and achieve higher conversion, but prevent the over cracking.

From the products, we could also see the differences between these two processes. The products of catalytic cracking include light gas, gasoline with high octane component, light cycle oil, heavy cycle oil, slurry oil, and coke by-product. As we talked about the objective of catalytic cracking previously, the gasoline with high octane component is the main product of catalytic cracking. For hydrocracking, diesel, jet fuel, and gasoline with extreme low sulfur component are the main products. The process uses metal catalyst and hydrotreating to remove heteroatoms such as sulfur and nitrogen. The products of hydrocracking contain low sulfur and nitrogen component which is more environmental friendly. At the same time, hydrocracking produces high yield of valuable distillates without some undesirable byproduct such as heavy oils, gas and coke.

 

References:

1. Class website lesson 7

https://www.e-education.psu.edu/fsc432/content/lesson-7-catalytic-conversion processes-part-1

Catalytic Cracking and Hydrocracking Processes

Blog 7

Write a blog post comparing catalytic cracking and catalytic hydrocracking processes with respect to feedstocks, process objectives, and products.


 

After all of the various physical separations have occurred to a crude oil, such as distillation, deasphalting, and dewaxing, there is a need to now change the composition of the crude oil using chemistry, breaking and creating bonds. The yields of this product after just undergoing the physical changes does not meet the demand required so further chemical separations must be pursued. The earliest discovered method for chemical separation is known as thermal cracking which uses brutal heat, heating the temperatures until the compounds crack and the chemical bonds are broken.

 

However the thermal cracking processes could not meet the demand for quality. This process delivered gasoline with a low octane number which was only acceptable for automobiles back in the day. Engines now have higher compression ratios and require a higher octane number in gasoline. They need a gasoline that does not ignite spontaneously with pressure when pressurized with air. This lead to the introduction of catalytic cracking.

 

Most catalytic conversion processes were developed right before and during Second World War for making higher quantities of better fuels with higher octane numbers. In catalytic cracking the reactive species are carbo cations that are produced on catalyst surfaces. Carbo cations go through isomerization reactions very quickly providing the opportunity to create isoparrafins. Almost all gasoline production in the U.S. is done through catalytic means.

There are a few different forms of catalytic cracking such as Houdry catalytic cracking, Thermafor catalytic cracking (TCC), and fluid catalytic cracking (FCC), however they are not all equally efficient. Fluid catalytic cracking is the most popular process and is the heart of the refinery. Catalytic cracking had a very flexible range of feedstocks that can be used from the gas oil boiling range all the way up to light vacuum gas oil. Cracking products after being fractionated can be separated into products such as gas, gasoline, light cycle oil (LCO) and heavy cycle oil (HCO).

For heavier aromatic feedstock materials such as heavy vacuum gas oil or vacuum distillation residue hydrogen must be introduced so that we can convert these heavy fractions without rejecting large quantities of Carbon. This is known as hydro cracking, which has the principal objective of upgrading products by decreasing the molecular weight and boiling point of heavy oils to produce products of saturated hydrocarbons, such as diesel and jet fuel. The hydrocracking process has two dimensions: Hydrogenation of aromatic rings and cracking of aliphatic compounds. Hydrocracking provides high yields of valuable distillates without producing low-grade byproducts such as heavy oils, gas, or coke, as experienced in carbon rejection processes such as coking. This method is less flexible with its feedstock range and also more costly than catalytic cracking.

Catalytic and Hydrocracking Processes

Petroleum refining has drastically changed throughout history based off of advances in distillation technologies and demand for specific types of fuels. Today, petroleum refinery processes consist of mainly Catalytic Cracking (introduced in 1937) and Hydrocracking (introduced in 1960). [1] The reason refineries use these processes in tangent with one another is because of their abilities to process different feedstocks, their similar refining objectives, and ultimately their final products.

Out of these two processes used today, Catalytic Cracking is the most popular refining method which produces 35 to 45% of United States naphtha production. The main feedstock that a Fluid Catalytic Cracker (FCC) uses to produce these distillate products are paraffinic atmospheric and vacuum gas oils. [1] The reason that a catalytic cracking process was even invented was because of the low octane gasoline yields and high possibility for coke formation in the distillation columns that occurred in thermal cracking. The catalysts that are used in the cracking processes can be separated into three classes, those being; acid-treated natural aluminosilicates, amorphorous synthetic silica-alumina combinations, and crystalline synthetic catalysts (zeolites). In regards to today’s FCC process, they most commonly use the zeolite class catalyst to break apart the long chained feedstock while utilizing a regenerator, a reactor, and fractionator. All of these units increase the thermal efficiency and allow for the main objectives, which are to increase high octane gasoline yield, to lower coke yield, to increase isobutene production, and to allow for higher conversions without over cracking, to be reached. [1] The final products following the FCC process are Gas, Gasoline, LCO, HCO, and Decant Oil.

The purpose of Hydrocracking is to work along with Catalytic Cracking and allow for all types of hydrocarbons to be refined into light to middle distillates. Hydrocracking uses feed stocks such as aromatic cycle oils and coker distillate (feedstocks that aren’t used in FCC). Before hydrocracking can be performed, all feeds have to be hydro treated in order to remove metallic salts, oxygen, organic nitrogen compounds, and sulfur to prevent catalyst poisoning. [1] Once the feedstock is treated, hydrocracking can be done in a single or two stage process. In a single-stage process, a single catalyst is used to convert the feed into gasoline and lighter products, and in a two-stage process multiple catalysts are used to recycle the reactor bottoms back into the reactor to further refine the heavier hydrocarbons to produce the desired yield of distillates. The ultimate objectives of Hydrocracking it to improve the gasoline boiling-range, to improve gasoline pool octane quality, to produce less coke, and to re-use the heavier by-products from Catalytic Cracking to produce a useable fuel. [1] In the grand scheme of things, the final product in Hydrocracking can be dependent on what fuel is needed. Most of the time hydrocracking produces products similar to those formed from Catalytic Cracking including gasoline, jet fuels, and diesel. [1]

Resources:
1. Gary, J. H., & Handwerk, G. E. (2007). Petroleum refining: technology and economics. New York: M. Dekker.

Catalytic cracking compared to Hydrocracking

Catalytic cracking and catalytic hydro cracking are two very different processes. Hydro cracking can be considered a more refined process because it is fairly new when considering refinery processes. It was first used commercially in 1958. Catalytic cracking initiates on the catalyst surface where ionic species are formed. This process produces branched chains alkanes from long straight chain alkanes. These branched chains alkanes, also called iso-alkanes, produces gasoline with very high octane #’s. This high octane gasoline is needed for modern day internal combustion engines. The high octane gasoline is produced because of the high concentrations of i- alkanes as well as the aromatics present in the catalytic cracking product. There are 3 main types of catalytic cracking Houdry, Thermafor, and Fluid catalytic cracking. Houdry catalytic cracking was the first continous commercialized catalytic cracking process. This process operates with three different reactors. This is so the process can remain continuous. This has to be done because after 10 minutes of operation there is a significant amount of coke build up in the reactor. The reactors are stripped with team and the coke burnt off before they are operational again. This process was introduced commercially in 1936. The second catalytic process is Thermafor catalytic cracking. This process was introduced in 1942. This process using one reactor and a moving bed of catalysts rather then the fixed bed in the Houdry process. This process has a much higher efficiency then the Houdry process. The Third type of catalytic cracking is Fluid catalytic cracking. This process has the highest theramal efficiency of the three and was also introduced commercially in 1942. The coke buildup is very rich in carbon which allows the production of distillates without the addition of hydrogen. All three of these processes have significant coke build up.
Catalytic hydrocracking is a much more modern process then catalytic cracking. It was first introduced commercially by chevron in 1958. The process objective of hydro cracking is similar to catalytic cracking but yet more refined. Hydrocracking aims to reduce the molecular weight and boiling point of heavy oils to produce saturated hydrocarbons. It has a wider range of feedstock then catalytic cracking. It uses highly aromatic feedstock and distillation residue, a much greater flexibility in feedstock. This process is also a hydrogen addition process unlike catalytic cracking. Catalytic cracking is a carbon rejection process. There is a advantage to hydrogen addition processes because there is no build up of low grade byproducts, such as coke. Although hydro cracking is a much more expensive process then catalytic cracking.

Catalytic Cracking vs. Catalytic Hydrocracking

Write a blog post comparing catalytic cracking and catalytic hydrocracking processes with respect to feedstocks, process objectives, and products.


 

Catalytic cracking is a process utilized by petroleum refineries which has been around for nearly a century. The reason this process became so popular is mainly due to its increased yield of gasoline with a higher octane rating, compared to a yield that would be achieved from thermal cracking. This process differs in a few ways from thermal cracking, as catalytic cracking incorporates the use of a catalyst, is more flexible in its feedstock, and does not require as high of temperatures and pressures as thermal cracking would.

Amongst the different types of catalytic cracking processes is Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC), introduced in 1942. This process in particular has seen a large use in the refining industry as it has a very flexible feedstock, which is usually straight-run atmospheric gas oil (AGO) and light vacuum gas oil (LVGO). Utilizing an acidic catalyst, long chains of n-alkanes are broken into shorter branched chains of isoalkanes, as well as cycloalkanes and aromatics. Different methods of catalytic cracking are used in refineries to produce LPG, cycle oils, and light hydrocarbons such as propane and butane, in addition to high-octane gasoline. Through alkylation and polymerization, these light hydrocarbons are used as feedstock to produce higher molecular weight isoalkanes and olefins which ultimately end up in the high-octane gasoline pool. Coking occurs during the cracking reactions, which works to deactivate the catalyst. When the coke is burned off with air, the temperature of the catalyst particles increases from the heat released by this, which provides the required energy for cracking to occur with minimal loss. This is what ultimately makes the cracking process so thermally efficient.

In 1958, the first commercial use of a process known as catalytic hydrocracking occurred. While catalytic cracking can support a wide range of feedstocks, hydrocracking is even more flexible and selective. Its main use in the refining industry is for its ability to produce light and middle distillates including large amounts of hydrogen, as well as its respect for environmental regulations that seek to limit the quantities of sulfur and aromatic hydrocarbon emissions. While these are all useful items, the overall goal of this process is to produce diesel and jet fuel from highly aromatic feedstocks such as residue and LGO from FCC. This is achieved by causing a decrease in the molecular weight and boiling point of heavy oils. The incorporation of bi-functional catalysts systems helps to keep coking under control. Hydrocracking involves a hydrogen-addition process, providing high yields of the desired distillates while avoiding the production of low-grade byproducts such as heavy oils, gas, and coke.

Catalytic and Hydrocracking

Cracking is the process of breaking straight chain alkanes into smaller straight chains hence the term “cracking.” This process was, and still is, and extremely important process in developing higher quality products such as gasoline that had an ever increasing octane number, something that is very desirable when producing gasoline. The two types of cracking processes are catalytic and thermal. In addition Catalytic cracking can be broken into catalytic cracking and catalytic hydrocracking.

Catalytic hydrocracking uses the same principles of catalytic cracking will also relying heavily on the elevated partial pressure of hydrogen gas. One positive attribute of catalytic hydrocracking is its ability to accept many different feeds that with minor adjustments can have a large effect on desired the product yields. FCC produces high octane gasoline from straight run gas oil. The long chains of n-alkanes in the feedstock are broken up through the process of catalytic cracking into smaller straight chain i-alkanes, or isoalkanes. Other products are cycloalkanes and other aromatic structures. As noted in the lesson, LPG, cycle oils, and olephin-rich light hydrocarbons are very important products of this cracking method as well.

The whole purpose with hydrocracking is the addition of hydrogen to keep the levels of coke productions under control. Without this, it would be much more difficult to introduce heavier crude oil fractions as a feedstock due to the high amounts of coking on the catalysts. So this is why hydrocracking was invented.

Catalytic cracking involves the presence of acid catalysts. This process has the effect of causing asymmetric breakage of bonds. Because of the use of free radicals in many cracking reactions, namely beta bond scission and hydrogen abstraction, the reactions are self-propagating as both free radicals and carbocations are formed. The formation of these two very highly unstable atomic and molecular structures respectively, result in the reaction proceeding until recombination is achieved.

Catalytic and catalytic hydrocracking are two very important processes that dominate the refining industry in their complexity and their yields of production of highly desirable products. These methods are constantly being heavily researched in order to better the products and the methods used in order to obtain them.

Cracking Processes

Catalytic Cracking process was developed back in the 1920’s by Eugene Houdry to upgrade and put to better use residue using a process based on cyclic fixed bed configuration, which was later commercialized in the 1930’s.1 Since then the process has been altered and upgraded into its current form as a fluidized bed catalytic cracking (FCC) process.1 The feedstock for this process is often light gas oil obtained from a vacuum distillation column.1 The process takes the feedstock and cracks ow value high molecular weight hydrocarbons to more valuable products of low molecular weight. This includes products such as gasoline, LPG Diesel, petrochemical feedstock’s such as propylene, and C4 gases like isobutylene, Isobutene, and butane.1 The major reactions is the process are cracking, Isomerization, Dethrogeneration, Hydrogen transfer, Cyclization, Condensation, Alkylation, and Dealkylation.1

Today Fluid Catalytic Cracking provides 50% of all transportation fuel, and 35% pf total gasoline fuel. In the process there are several specific steps that take place. The first step is the reaction step, in which the feedstock reacts with catalyst and cracks into different hydrocarbons.1 Secondly the regeneration steps takes place, in which the catalyst is reactivated by burning off cook, and recirculated to reactor.1 The fractionation step is next, in which the cracked hydrocarbon stream is separated into its various products. 1

As technology progressed and as feed stocks became heavier with large concentrations sulfur, nitrogen, and heavy metals, a new process was in demand to obtain desirable products. Hydrocracking meet that need by providing a more versatile process which could convert low quality feed stock into high quality products like gasoline, naphtha, kerosene, diesel, and hydro wax used as petrochemical feedstock. 1 This process uses a wide variety of feedstock’s like naphtha, atmospheric gas oil, vacuum gas oils, coke oils, catalytically cracked light and heavy cycle oil, cracked residue, and deasphalted oil.1 The end products from this feed are high quality products will excellent product quality, and low sulfur content.1 The feed in this process goes from straight run gas oil, vacuum gas oils, cycle oils, coker gas oils, thermally cracked stocks, solvent deasphalted residual oil, straight run naphtha, cracked naphtha, into desirable products including liquefied petroleum gas, motor gasoline, reformer feeds, aviation turbine fuel, diesel fuels, heating oils, solvent and thinners, lube oil, and FCC feed.1

When we compare catalytic cracking to hydrocracking we see two very different processes.1 Catalytic cracking is defined as a carbon rejection process, where Hydro-cracking is hydrogen addition process. Catalytic also uses riser-regeneration-configuration, where hydro uses down flow packed bed.1 The products for catalytic are LPG’s and gasoline, and for hydro they are kerosene and diesel.1 Catalytic cracking produces products which are rich in unsaturated components, where hydro cracking results in products with few aromatics, low sulfur and nitrogen content.1

References

  1. Lecture 5: Catalytic Cracking: Fluid Catalytic Cracking and Hydro-cracking
    1. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&ved=0CF0QFjAH&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnptel.ac.in%2Fcourses%2F103107082%2Fmodule6%2Flecture5%2Flecture5.pdf&ei=AZ25U6TABIqhyASrlICAAg&usg=AFQjCNG_5vWWo1ZoBVsPb_ZcB7lBXi3i3A&sig2=XKP7yFZafdnQw2BTKUpb5A&bvm=bv.70138588,d.b2U

A Comparison of Catalytic Cracking to Catalytic Hydrocracking

Catalytic cracking is a petroleum refining process that dates back to as early as 1915 however it came into prominence during the Second World War. There was a need for and improved process that would provide higher quality and quantity products than the brute force tactics used in thermal cracking. By applying newer, more advanced knowledge of chemistry and chemical reactions petroleum refining could produce better yields of gasoline with higher octane ratings than thermal cracking could ever hope to accomplish.

Catalytic cracking accomplishes this goal by cracking small ionic molecules, called carbocations, off of longer straight chain alkanes. These carbocations can then reattach to an alkane molecule to create an iso-alkane which has the required higher octane ratings needed in today’s society. Catalytic cracking, as noted before, runs on relatively long straight chain alkanes and therefore the feedstocks usually consist of, light cycle oils and potentially heavy gas oils or light vacuum gas oils1. These types of oils have the size necessary to be able to be cracked while still forming the correct length range of alkane products. The primary goal of catalytic cracking is to increase the quantity of production of higher octane gasoline than could be done from straight run products or thermal cracking, however constituents such as kerosene, LPG, heating oil, and olefins are produced as well2.

Catalytic hydrocracking, also known as hydrocracking, is a refinery process that was just added in the last thirty years with a main goal of enhancing catalytic cracking. The process of hydrocracking is typically completed in two main parts: first hydrotreatment must be conducted before the actual hydrocracking can take place. Catalytic hydrocracking can bring in feedstocks such as some atmospheric residue, heavy vacuum gas oil, light cycle oil, and potentially even deasphalted oil which all contain high concentrations of aromatic and heteroatom compounds3. Because these feeds contain such high concentrations, hydrogen must be added first, during hydrotreatment, in order to convert highly stable, unsaturated aromatic compounds to saturated aliphatic compounds. Once this process has taken place the newly formed cycloalkanes are cracked in the presence of more hydrogen to prevent coking. The cracking process, called hydrocracking, forms the necessary alkane molecules needed in catalytic cracking.

Catalytic hydrocracking is beneficial to catalytic cracking not only because it can produce some of its feedstock but also because it provides a way to remove heteroatoms such as nitrogen, sulfur, oxygen, and other metals before they enter the catalytic cracker. If these contaminants were to enter the catalytic cracking system they could potentially poison the catalysts which are needed to run reactions forming the iso-alkanes.

  1. “Fluid catalytic cracking.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 4 July 2014. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_catalytic_cracking#Flow_diagram_and_process_description>.
  2. “Cracking.” Encyclopedia of Earth. N.p., n.d. Web. 4 July 2014. <http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/151525/>.
  3. Meister, Jill , and Roger Lawrence. “Hydrocracking, Processing Heavy Feedstocks to Maximize High Quality Distillate Fuels.” UOP. N.p., n.d. Web. 4 July 2014. <http://www.uop.com/hydrocracking-processing-heavy-feedstocks-maximize-high-quality-distillate-fuels/>.